Existing infrastructure · 9 min read

What should an existing connectivity infrastructure review cover?

Use what is already there before buying or building more. A structured review can expose spare capacity, reusable routes, hidden dependencies, unnecessary services and avoidable construction.

Prepared by CROSSLast reviewed 14 August 2026
Direct answer

An existing-infrastructure review should identify physical assets, live services, carrier handovers, contracts, capacity, resilience, support arrangements and known faults. The objective is to establish what can be reused, upgraded, rationalised or replaced before a new procurement or construction programme begins.

Start with a complete inventory

Collect current circuit schedules, carrier invoices, network diagrams, duct and chamber drawings, fibre test records, contracts, support arrangements and any known fault history. Where records are incomplete, confirm the physical position through site inspection and carrier enquiries.

  • Existing ducts, chambers, fibre and building entries
  • Carrier handover points, racks, power and internal containment
  • Live internet, Ethernet, wavelength, dark-fibre, mobile, microwave or satellite services
  • Capacity, utilisation, contract end dates and upgrade paths
  • Primary and backup routes, underlying wholesale networks and common points
  • Support hours, service levels, monitoring and fault procedures

Review the physical route and ownership

A service inventory alone does not show whether the physical infrastructure is usable. Establish who owns each duct or fibre section, where it runs, whether spare capacity exists and whether access rights, wayleaves or maintenance responsibilities are documented.

Common issue: two services may appear separate commercially but share the same duct, chamber, bridge crossing, building entry or upstream node.

Test the commercial position

Record recurring charges, construction contributions, contract dates, notice periods, indexation, termination liabilities and ownership of installed apparatus. This allows the project team to distinguish a technical constraint from a contract that can be renegotiated or replaced.

Turn the findings into decisions

01Reuse

Retain infrastructure or services that meet the requirement.

02Upgrade

Increase capacity or improve support on an existing route.

03Rationalise

Remove duplicated or poor-value services.

04Replace

Procure a better carrier or product.

05Build

Construct only the missing segment that the market cannot supply.

What the review should produce

The output should be a clear asset and service register, route and resilience summary, contract calendar, risk list and recommended action plan. It should distinguish confirmed evidence from assumptions that still require survey or carrier validation.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions

Can CROSS review infrastructure that was installed by several different suppliers?

Yes. The review can consolidate physical assets, live services, contracts and responsibilities into one evidence-led view.

Do we need accurate drawings before starting?

No. Existing records are useful, but gaps can be identified and prioritised for site survey, carrier enquiry or test work.

Can the review identify cost savings?

Yes. It can identify unused capacity, duplicated services, poor contract structures and routes that can be replaced or renegotiated.

Does a desktop review replace a physical survey?

No. It identifies what is known and where targeted site or route verification is required.

Apply this to a live site

Send us the location, existing position and required outcome.

CROSS will identify the most useful next step without requiring you to choose the technology first.

Start the free desktop survey