For altnets, ISPs and fibre network operators

Reduce network cost without weakening the network.

A confidential, operator-led review of backhaul, transit, colocation, interconnect and network architecture—focused on recurring savings that can actually be implemented.

Network economics

Recurring infrastructure cost can outlive the decision that created it.

Circuits are often bought quickly to support build targets, resilience or an immediate launch. Over time, contracts renew, capacity becomes stranded, new networks arrive nearby and the POP estate grows more complicated than the customer base requires.

The result is rarely solved by asking every supplier for a small discount. The technical requirement, route, product, location and supplier model all need to be challenged together.

The network-cost diagnostic

Build an evidence-backed savings register.

The work establishes the baseline, identifies commercial and architectural alternatives, quantifies implementation cost and separates headline opportunity from achievable savings.

Backhaul and access

Openreach EAD and fibre-tax exposure, on-net alternatives, dark fibre, wavelengths, aggregation routes, contract expiry and early termination.

  • Cost per site and per Gbps
  • Route and supplier concentration
  • Replacement and migration options

Transit and interconnect

Commit levels, burst structures, peering coverage, cross-connects, port utilisation, supplier mix and data-centre handover locations.

  • Committed versus used capacity
  • Blended unit economics
  • Resilience and growth headroom

POP and colocation estate

Duplicated sites, underused racks, power, remote hands, hardware lifecycle, cross-connect charges and operational complexity.

  • Cost-to-serve by POP
  • Consolidation scenarios
  • Migration risk and sequencing

Architecture and contracts

Capacity standards, protected-route policy, supplier dependencies, termination rights, indexation, support obligations and change control.

  • Requirement versus inherited design
  • Commercial leverage and timing
  • Operational acceptance criteria

Not a theoretical benchmark

Every opportunity needs an owner, a route and a number.

The savings register shows what can change, why the current cost exists, the expected run-rate benefit, one-off implementation cost, dependency, risk and realistic delivery date.

OpportunityEvidenceActionProof
Replace EAD routeOn-net fibre nearbyRFP + migrationInvoice run-rate
Right-size transit95th percentile dataRenegotiate commitBlended £/Gbps
Close duplicate POPLow utilisationRehome servicesAnnual site cost
Consolidate suppliersFragmented contractsPortfolio tenderRenewed terms

From opportunity to realised saving

The implementation matters as much as the analysis.

A lower-cost quote has no value until the replacement route is live, accepted and the old commitment has ended without an avoidable service impact.

01

Baseline

Contracts, invoices, topology, utilisation, service criticality and renewal dates.

02

Challenge

Test the technical standard, route, product, supplier and location.

03

Market

Use carrier relationships and structured procurement to create credible alternatives.

04

Negotiate

Commercial terms, implementation commitments, contract protections and exit.

05

Migrate

Change plan, technical acceptance, customer risk and operational handover.

06

Verify

Confirm the old cost has ceased and the recurring saving appears in the accounts.

Commercial timing

Contract dates create leverage—or remove it.

Renewal windows, notice periods and early-termination terms should be mapped before supplier engagement begins. The strongest technical option can be commercially irrelevant if the incumbent contract has already rolled.

Useful trigger points

  • 12–18 months before major renewals
  • Before refinancing or an infrastructure transaction
  • After network build slows or completes
  • Before a POP or core refresh
  • When a new on-net supplier enters a location
  • Following material supplier-performance issues
Commercial model

Fixed diagnostic. Agreed implementation. Optional success fee.

A clear baseline and measurement method are agreed before any success fee applies. The client retains visibility of supplier proposals and final commercial decisions.

Diagnostic fee+Implementation scope+Optional verified savings fee

Confidential and operator-led

Designed for CFO, CTO, board and investor scrutiny.

The review connects the technical design to the cost base. It can be undertaken for an individual operator, an investor’s portfolio or as part of a wider operating-model and transaction workstream.

Open a confidential conversation

Frequently asked questions

Altnet and ISP cost optimisation.

The initial discussion can be high level and covered by an NDA before contracts or topology are shared.

Which costs do you review?

The scope can include backhaul, Openreach EAD exposure, dark fibre, wavelengths, IP transit, peering, colocation, cross-connects, POP estate, hardware support and related supplier contracts.

Is this only for distressed altnets?

No. The strongest time to review the cost base is before contract renewals, refinancing, consolidation, network expansion or a strategic transaction. The work is equally relevant to growing operators that want a more efficient platform.

Will lower cost reduce resilience?

It should not. The review starts with the operational requirement and risk appetite. Savings that introduce an unacceptable single point of failure, capacity constraint or support risk are identified rather than presented as straightforward wins.

Can you negotiate directly with carriers?

Yes, where authorised. We can prepare the commercial strategy, run a structured market engagement, negotiate terms and support migration or replacement of the existing service.

How can the fees be structured?

A typical model is a fixed diagnostic followed by an agreed implementation scope. A success fee linked to independently verified savings can be considered where it aligns incentives and the measurement method is agreed in advance.

Will our supplier and pricing information remain confidential?

The work can be conducted under a mutual non-disclosure agreement with controlled access to contracts, invoices, network diagrams and performance data.

Start early

Turn recurring network cost into an actionable work programme.

A short confidential discussion can establish whether the likely opportunity justifies a structured diagnostic.

Arrange a confidential review